WTC에 추락한 비행기가 보잉 767-200 . 175편이 아니라는 주장을 좀더 과학적??으로 분석해 보자.
다음 사진을 한번 보면...
영상 분석 결과는 다음과 같다..
As we saw in "The Wrong Plane", the nose section of a 200 series, A, is shorter than the wing assembly, B. Whereas for the 300 series A is longer that B.
767-200 => A:B = 190:200 = 0.95:1, i.e. A is less than B
767-300 => A:B = 221:200 = 1.105:1, i.e. A is greater than B
While the NIST frames give us A:B = 20.76:19.91 = 1.04:1
(remember that these are Lower Limit Values, see Techie Notes),
in other words, A is greater than B
Therefore: This plane's fuselage is too long to be a Boeing 767-200.
Ergo: The plane that hit the South Tower was not N612UA. It was not Flight 175!
분석결과...767-200 이기에는 너무 길다 였다...--;;
정보 출처...http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
------------------------------
다음 사진을 한번 보면...
영상 분석 결과는 다음과 같다..
As we saw in "The Wrong Plane", the nose section of a 200 series, A, is shorter than the wing assembly, B. Whereas for the 300 series A is longer that B.
767-200 => A:B = 190:200 = 0.95:1, i.e. A is less than B
767-300 => A:B = 221:200 = 1.105:1, i.e. A is greater than B
While the NIST frames give us A:B = 20.76:19.91 = 1.04:1
(remember that these are Lower Limit Values, see Techie Notes),
in other words, A is greater than B
Therefore: This plane's fuselage is too long to be a Boeing 767-200.
Ergo: The plane that hit the South Tower was not N612UA. It was not Flight 175!
분석결과...767-200 이기에는 너무 길다 였다...--;;
정보 출처...http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
------------------------------
일본에 사는 친구 odyne이 올린 9.11테러 관련 방송다큐멘터리 시청소감이 연재됩니다.